Web applications are a prime target for cyberattacks. They’re often public-facing, constantly changing, and heavily relied on for business operations. That makes them an easy focus for threat actors looking to exploit weaknesses.
The challenge is that many vulnerabilities don’t show up in static code reviews or secure development checklists. They only appear when the application is actually running, interacting with data, users, and the internet in real time.
That’s where Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) steps in. It scans live applications, mimicking real-world attack scenarios to uncover hidden flaws that could slip through other testing methods.
Here are the top five vulnerabilities DAST is especially good at finding, before they turn into a major security incident.
1. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
XSS attacks happen when an attacker manages to inject malicious scripts into web pages viewed by other users. These scripts can steal session tokens, redirect users to malicious sites, or perform actions on behalf of the victim.
There are a few different types of XSS, including:
- Stored XSS – where the script is permanently stored on the server
- Reflected XSS – where the script comes from a user-supplied input, like a URL
- DOM-based XSS – where the vulnerability exists in client-side code rather than server-side
DAST testing is especially effective at detecting XSS because it can see how the application responds to injected scripts in real time. It observes how input gets reflected back to the browser, whether proper encoding is in place, and how different components handle user-supplied content.
Many development teams miss XSS in manual testing because it often depends on context, where and how user input appears in the page. DAST takes the guesswork out of that.
2. SQL Injection
SQL injection is still one of the most dangerous and common vulnerabilities, despite being well-known for decades. When an application fails to sanitize user inputs used in database queries, attackers can manipulate those queries to access or modify data.
With SQL injection, an attacker might be able to:
- View sensitive data they shouldn’t have access to
- Alter or delete database records
- Execute administrative operations
- Bypass authentication
DAST tools simulate this kind of attack by injecting test payloads into fields like login forms, search bars, and URL parameters. They observe how the database and application respond. If a database error appears or unexpected results are returned, that’s a strong sign of a vulnerability.
Because DAST works against the running app, it doesn’t need to know how the database queries are built in the code. That makes it a useful layer of defense, especially when the application stack changes often or when code complexity hides unsafe query practices.
3. Authentication and Session Management Flaws
Authentication mechanisms are more fragile than they look. It’s not just about logging in. It’s about what happens before, during, and after the login process.
Some of the common issues include:
- Session IDs exposed in URLs
- Weak session expiration policies
- Lack of secure cookie flags
- Insecure password recovery functions
- Multiple failed login attempts not being blocked
DAST can flag problems like these by analyzing session behavior. For example, it can check whether a session token remains valid after logout, or if switching accounts reuses the same token. It can test forgotten password flows to see if the reset process is easily abused.
These are issues that often go undetected in static reviews, because the logic spans several components. A DAST scan, on the other hand, focuses on the end-to-end behavior — which is exactly where attackers focus their attention too.
4. Security Misconfigurations
Sometimes the biggest problems come from simple misconfigurations. An outdated library, a directory listing left open, or a debug page accidentally pushed to production can all be serious vulnerabilities.
Some examples DAST can uncover:
- Unprotected admin panels
- Verbose error messages showing stack traces
- Outdated server headers or software versions
- Directory traversal vulnerabilities
- Unintended access to configuration files
These issues are often overlooked because they don’t always involve code changes. They come from deployment oversights or default settings that were never locked down.
DAST is valuable here because it interacts with the application from the outside, like an attacker would. It tries different paths, tests for exposed files, and checks whether server responses are leaking information. It can even pick up signs of outdated components by analyzing responses and headers.
5. Insufficient Input Validation
When applications don’t properly validate inputs, a wide range of attacks become possible. This category overlaps with others, but it’s broad enough to include things like:
- Command injection
- Path traversal
- HTTP header injection
- CRLF injection
- Parameter tampering
The core problem here is trust — the application assumes input is safe without enforcing rules on length, type, or structure.
DAST is useful in this area because it sends malformed or unexpected data to inputs across the application. If it gets an unusual or dangerous response, it flags that as suspicious. This sort of fuzzing helps uncover weaknesses developers might not think to test for directly.
For example, an input field expecting a number might behave unpredictably if it receives a special character or a long string. DAST tests those boundaries methodically, which is difficult to do consistently by hand.
Why These Matter More Than Ever
Web applications are evolving rapidly. Microservices, APIs, and JavaScript-heavy front ends introduce more places for things to go wrong. That means vulnerabilities aren’t always in plain sight. They hide in edge cases, obscure paths, and user flows no one anticipated.
What makes DAST so valuable is that it doesn’t need to see the code. It just needs a running application. From there, it probes the system the way a real attacker would — methodically, persistently, and without assumptions.
That’s what makes it a strong last line of defense. Even if your code passed static analysis, even if your team followed best practices, there’s still a chance something slipped through. DAST helps catch it before an attacker does.
Make It Harder for Attackers
The goal isn’t perfection. No system is bulletproof. But if you can find and fix the types of issues DAST uncovers — like XSS, SQL injection, session flaws, misconfigurations, and weak input handling — you make your application much harder to exploit.
DAST won’t replace your other security practices. It’s not a magic solution. But it does give you a real-world perspective, testing your application the same way malicious users would.
And that perspective can be the difference between a small fix in staging and a public breach.
People also read this: Why Does It Burn? 5 Common Products That Can Cause Allergic Reactions