When a collision with a commercial truck occurs, victims often face extensive medical bills, property damage, and emotional trauma. Filing an insurance claim should provide a clear path to recovery, but this process rarely goes smoothly. Insurance companies, driven by profit motives, routinely deploy tactics to minimize or deny compensation. These strategies can significantly weaken a valid case if the injured party isn’t prepared to identify and counter them.
To avoid these pitfalls, speaking with a Denver truck accident attorney early in the process is critical. Insurers often begin working to protect their interests within hours of a crash. While victims are still recovering, adjusters collect information to reduce liability, dispute injuries, and limit their financial responsibility. Understanding these tactics can help claimants avoid common traps and protect their legal rights.
Delaying the Claims Process to Create Pressure
One of the most common insurance tactics is intentional delay. Adjusters often postpone processing or settling claims to exploit the claimant’s financial hardship. As medical bills mount and lost wages take a toll, victims may feel compelled to accept any offer, regardless of how inadequate it is, just to stay afloat.
These unnecessary delays can include failing to return phone calls, requesting redundant documents, or claiming they need more time to investigate. The goal is to wear down claimants until they accept a lowball settlement. This tactic is particularly harmful in truck accident cases where injuries may require long-term treatment and the full extent of damages isn’t immediately known.
Misrepresenting Policy Coverage or Legal Rights
Insurance representatives sometimes mislead claimants about the scope of the policy or their rights under Colorado law. An adjuster might falsely assert that only unavoidable expenses are covered or that compensation is capped when it isn’t. In other situations, they may tell victims they don’t need an attorney or suggest hiring one will reduce their settlement.
These tactics are designed to keep victims uninformed and undercompensated. An insurer may also misstate deadlines or suggest missing a document disqualifies a claim entirely. Colorado law provides strong protections for injured parties, and claimants should be wary of taking any legal advice from an opposing insurance company.
Requesting Recorded Statements to Use Against You
Soon after a truck accident, the insurance adjuster will likely request a recorded statement. While this may sound routine, it’s often a calculated move. Adjusters ask misleading questions or pressure victims to speculate about fault, injury severity, or what happened during the crash. These recordings can later be used to argue inconsistencies or cast doubt on the claim.
Even seemingly harmless statements—like “I’m feeling better” or “I didn’t see the truck until the last minute”—can be twisted and taken out of context. Recorded interviews are rarely in the claimant’s best interest, especially before a complete medical evaluation. A Denver truck accident lawyer advises against providing these statements without legal guidance.
Minimizing or Disputing Medical Treatment
Insurance companies frequently challenge medical treatment after a truck accident. They may argue that the injuries are unrelated to the crash, that treatment was excessive, or that the victim failed to mitigate their damages. These claims often come from internal “medical reviewers” who never examined the patient.
Insurers sometimes push for early settlements before the full scope of medical needs is known. Accepting a quick payout means signing a release of liability, which bars future claims, even if additional surgeries or therapy are required. Insurers know this and try to resolve cases prematurely to avoid covering long-term care.
Colorado follows a modified comparative negligence standard,which means a victim’s compensation can be reduced if they are found partially at fault, and eliminated if they are 50% or more responsible. Insurance companies exploit this rule by aggressively shifting blame to the injured party.
They might claim the victim was speeding, distracted, or failed to avoid the accident. Even in cases involving apparent truck driver negligence, insurers look for ways to reduce their share of liability. This tactic becomes especially dangerous without access to accident reconstruction experts or black box data from the truck.
Surveillance and Social Media Monitoring
Insurance carriers don’t stop at paperwork and interviews—they often conduct surveillance or monitor a claimant’s social media presence. They aim to find anything that contradicts reported injuries or suggests the victim has recovered. A single photo, post, or video can be taken out of context and used to dispute pain and suffering claims.
For example, posting a picture at a family gathering could be used to argue that the injury isn’t as debilitating as stated, even if the outing caused significant pain afterward. Claimants should assume they are being watched or reviewed online throughout their case.
Offering a Fast Settlement That Doesn’t Reflect Full Damages
Quick settlements may seem like a relief, but they often don’t reflect the actual value of a claim. Insurance companies know victims are vulnerable after a truck crash, especially when dealing with lost income and growing medical bills. Offering an early payout helps the insurer limit future obligations.
Accepting a settlement means forfeiting any right to pursue additional compensation. Once the agreement is signed, it’s final—even if new complications arise or treatment becomes more expensive. Understanding the long-term implications of any offer is essential before agreeing to the terms.
Empowering Yourself Against Insurance Manipulation
Insurance companies are skilled at protecting their bottom line, often at the expense of crash victims. Their tactics—from strategic delays to misleading statements—exploit uncertainty, fear, and financial desperation. In truck accident cases, where the stakes are high and the injuries often severe, falling for these tricks can result in substantial losses.
Informed victims are better equipped to safeguard their rights and resist pressure tactics. Knowing what to expect from insurance carriers—and how to respond—can make the difference between fair compensation and an undervalued claim.
Please follow and like us: