Skip to content
Refpropos.

Refpropos.

  • Home
  • Automobile
  • HVAC
  • Supercar
  • Volvo
  • Entrepreneur
  • Toggle search form
BMW M4 CS review | Autocar

BMW M4 CS review | Autocar

Posted on May 22, 2025 By rehan.rafique No Comments on BMW M4 CS review | Autocar

Drive flows through an eight-speed automatic gearbox from ZF, which then feeds an electronically controlled limited-slip differential between the rear wheels. The front-rear torque split is constantly changing, though in the default ‘4WD’ it still overtly favours the back axle, and does so to an even greater extent in ‘4WD Sport’. At the back of the car you’ll find an aggressive carbonfibre diffuser to match the splitter at the front. More meaningfully, the CS gets a titanium exhaust system some 4kg lighter than the regular car’s stainless-steel plumbing.

Move round to the flanks and you can’t help clocking the pronounced negative camber, especially on the front axle. It’s quite the statement of intent, and is the only visible trace of a suite of model-specific tweaks applied to the CS’s damping rates, springs (3% stiffer than those of the Comp at the front, 5% at the rear) and anti-roll bars, whose droplinks are now rose-jointed. The aim is to make the CS feel more connected on the road and quicker on the track. The same applies to CS-specific steering mapping and the tune for the Dynamic Stability Control and much-loved M Dynamic Mode, all of it to minimise lap times and put a smile on your face while doing so, for novice or expert. At least, that is the intention here.

The other notable element of the CS package is a touch of weight-saving. As standard, the bonnet, roof and plenty of aero addenda are wrought in CFRP, and this car is also fitted with M carbon-ceramic brakes, at a cost of £8800. All in, this car weighed 1747kg, versus 1800kg for the pre-facelift M4 Competition we tested in 2021, which had cast-iron brakes. It’s a notable saving, though doesn’t threaten the 1607kg of 911 Carrera GTS we tested recently – undoubtedly the M4 CS’s closest rival in terms of price, power and philosophy. Even so, 309bhp per tonne is hardly to be sniffed at.Both cars share the same 542bhp 3.0-litre straight six, plus the punchy stripes adorning a full-carbon bonnet, as well as having standard-fit carbon-ceramic brakes. 

The CSL also donates its titanium exhaust silencer, which hangs provocatively from the CS’s reprofiled, carbon apron. Under the skin, the CS has a bespoke tune for the damping, springs, DSC, steering and brakes. 

Automobile

Post navigation

Previous Post: Buying Salvage Cars: What to Expect on Auction Day
Next Post: Ferrari x Charles Leclerc’s Lifestyle Capsule Collection

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • The Federal Government Just Killed California’s EV Mandate
  • What Are the Most Creative Party Favors That Aren’t Junk?
  • Can Astrology Boost Your Bankroll? The Zodiac Casino Bonus Experiment
  • 5 Tips for Successful Cap Table Management
  • CPO Spotlight: 2022 Honda Accord

Categories

  • Automobile
  • Entrepreneur
  • HVAC
  • Supercar
  • Volvo

Copyright © 2025 Refpropos..

Powered by PressBook Blog WordPress theme