Are your green building investments safeguarding both the environment and occupant health? With increasing awareness of sustainable practices, green construction is becoming a priority for developers worldwide. According to Precedence Research, the global green buildings market is projected to grow from $565.33 billion in 2024.
It is expected to reach approximately $1,374.23 billion by 2034, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.3%. Naturally, the focus on sustainability has never been more prominent.
However, the critical step of professional asbestos removal is sometimes overlooked in the rush to retrofit and renovate older structures. This oversight can lead to significant health risks and financial liabilities. Hence, it is imperative for investors to ensure that their sustainable projects also prioritize safety.
A Snapshot of the Green Building Boom
The global green building market is experiencing robust growth, driven by environmental concerns and the demand for energy-efficient structures. As per an IMARC Group report, the green building materials market is valued at USD 374.7 billion in 2024.
This reflects a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.85% during 2025-2033. Investors are channeling significant capital into sustainable projects, recognizing their potential for long-term returns and compliance with evolving environmental regulations.
Understanding the Asbestos Hazard in Older Buildings
Asbestos poses serious health risks when its fibers become airborne. However, it has been a common component in construction materials due to its durability and heat resistance. Inhalation of asbestos can lead to diseases such as asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma, warns Mesothelioma Hope.
Despite its known dangers, asbestos-containing materials remain present in many structures built before the 1980s. The World Health Organization attributes over 200,000 deaths annually to asbestos-related diseases.
Regulatory Gaps in Green Building Standards
Green building certifications like LEED emphasize energy efficiency and environmental impact. However, they may not comprehensively address hazardous materials like asbestos. This regulatory gap can lead to sustainability efforts inadvertently disturbing asbestos-containing materials, increasing exposure risks. Investors must be aware of these limitations to ensure comprehensive risk management.
Beyond asbestos, other hazardous materials may also be overlooked in green building standards, highlights the Clean Management Environmental Group. Older buildings often contain lead-based paints and plumbing systems.
Green certifications may not mandate the removal or remediation of these materials, posing health risks during renovations. Used in older HVAC systems, CFCs (chlorofluorocarbon) contribute to ozone depletion. Green building standards may not require the replacement of such systems, potentially undermining environmental goals.
Financial Risks for Investors in Overlooking Asbestos
Neglecting asbestos hazards can have significant financial implications:
Direct Costs
Unexpected asbestos abatement can significantly increase project expenses, particularly when asbestos-containing materials are discovered during renovation or demolition. According to Asbestos Professionals LLC, asbestos removal costs increase significantly for projects with complex requirements.
High-risk areas or extensive contamination further escalate these expenses. Additionally, delays from asbestos removal can significantly raise project costs by increasing labor expenses and prolonging completion timelines.
Indirect Costs
Beyond direct expenses, the financial repercussions of asbestos mismanagement extend to legal and reputational damages. Companies found negligent in addressing asbestos hazards face substantial lawsuits and regulatory penalties.
For instance, James Hardie Industries, a leading construction materials manufacturer, has faced significant financial challenges from asbestos-related issues. These include billions in compensation claims due to its historical involvement with asbestos products. It negatively impacted market trust.
Also, it diminished the company’s reputation, as evidenced by a recent public outrage over the company’s sponsorship, reported by ABC News. These issues can potentially reduce investor confidence, stock prices, project financing, and long-term profitability.
Proactive Strategies for Investors
To mitigate these risks, investors should consider the following strategies:
- Due diligence: Conduct thorough assessments to identify asbestos presence before initiating green renovations. Engaging certified asbestos inspectors can provide accurate evaluations.
- Integrated project planning: Collaborate with contractors who prioritize both sustainability and safety, ensuring that asbestos management is incorporated into the renovation plan.
- Regulatory compliance: Stay informed about local and international asbestos regulations to ensure all projects meet or exceed safety standards.
- Advocate for enhanced certification standards: Support the development and adoption of green building standards that integrate hazardous material management to protect both occupants and investments.
Leveraging Innovations in Sustainable Asbestos Removal
Advancements in technology have enhanced the efficiency and safety of asbestos removal, utilizing sophisticated methods to reduce exposure risks. Investing in companies focused on sustainable asbestos abatement supports safer practices and aligns with environmental and social governance (ESG) goals.
These companies prioritize public health and ecological preservation, making them appealing to responsible investors. Emphasizing sustainability also aids in regulatory compliance and can improve a company’s reputation, fostering long-term growth and profitability.
FAQs
How do green building materials compare in terms of lifecycle impact?
Green building materials, such as recycled plastics, natural earthen substances, and cross-laminated timber (CLT), offer distinct lifecycle impacts. Recycled plastics reduce landfill waste and lower energy consumption in infrastructure applications. Natural materials like cob and rammed earth enhance indoor comfort. CLT serves as a sustainable alternative to steel and concrete, boasting a low carbon footprint and high strength-to-weight ratio.
How can investors advocate for better green building regulations?
Investors can advocate for improved green building regulations by collaborating with policymakers to establish robust standards and certification programs. Engaging with organizations like the World Green Building Council can amplify efforts to align building policies with global climate goals. Supporting initiatives that promote the benefits of green construction technologies across the value chain further drives regulatory advancements.
What are alternative sustainable practices for older buildings?
Adaptive reuse, which repurposes existing structures, avoids extensive demolition that could disturb asbestos-containing materials. Encapsulation methods seal asbestos in place, ensuring safety without compromising the building’s integrity. Pre-renovation hazard assessments and using advanced abatement technologies further safeguard both occupant health and project timelines.
Investors play a pivotal role in shaping the future of sustainable construction. By acknowledging and addressing asbestos risks, they can protect both public health and their financial interests. A holistic approach that integrates safety into sustainability efforts is essential for the long-term success of green building initiatives.
People also listened to this: Lighting The Way: LED Lighting’s Role in Sustainability